John Jordan
Production Variance Analysis
in SAP Controlling
®
Bonn � Boston
Contents at a Glance
1
Initial Planning .......................................................................
23
2
Cost Estimates ........................................................................
45
3
Actual Postings .......................................................................
97
4
Period-End Processing ............................................................
111
5
Scrap Variance ........................................................................
175
6
Reporting ................................................................................
217
A
Glossary ..................................................................................
253
B
Bibliography ............................................................................
273
C
Additional Resources ..............................................................
275
D
The Author ..............................................................................
279
Contents
1
Initial Planning .........................................................................
23
1.1
1.2
Sales and Operations Planning ....................................................
Long-Term Planning ....................................................................
1.2.1
Create Planning Scenario ..............................................
1.2.2
Long-Term Planning Run ...............................................
1.2.3
Transfer Requirements to Purchasing .............................
1.2.4
Transfer Activity Quantities to Cost Center Accounting ...
Cost Center Planning ..................................................................
Summary ....................................................................................
24
25
26
28
32
35
38
44
Cost Estimates ..........................................................................
45
2.1
46
46
50
51
52
54
55
56
57
58
61
64
64
68
72
74
76
78
79
81
83
1.3
1.4
2
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.6
Master Data ................................................................................
2.1.1
Material Master ............................................................
2.1.2
Bill of Material ..............................................................
2.1.3
Routing ........................................................................
2.1.4
Product Cost Collector ..................................................
Overhead Costs ..........................................................................
2.2.1
Calculation Base ...........................................................
2.2.2
Overhead Rate ..............................................................
2.2.3
Credit Key .....................................................................
Cost Components .......................................................................
Costing Variant ...........................................................................
Standard Cost Estimate ...............................................................
2.5.1
Create ...........................................................................
2.5.2
Mark and Release .........................................................
Costing Run ................................................................................
2.6.1
Selection .......................................................................
2.6.2
Structural Explosion ......................................................
2.6.3
Costing .........................................................................
2.6.4
Analysis ........................................................................
2.6.5
Marking ........................................................................
2.6.6
Release .........................................................................
7
Contents
2.7
Preliminary Cost Estimate ...........................................................
2.7.1
Production Process .......................................................
2.7.2
Transfer Control ............................................................
2.7.3
Mass-Processing ...........................................................
Mixed Cost Estimate ...................................................................
2.8.1
Quantity Structure and Costing Version ........................
2.8.2
Create Procurement Alternative ....................................
2.8.3
Deine Mixing Ratios ....................................................
2.8.4
Create Mixed Cost Estimate ..........................................
Summary ....................................................................................
85
87
87
90
90
91
92
93
94
96
Actual Postings .........................................................................
97
2.8
2.9
3
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
4
97
97
98
99
99
100
101
101
102
103
103
104
106
108
109
110
Period-End Processing .............................................................. 111
4.1
4.2
8
Primary Costs ..............................................................................
3.1.1
Goods Issue to Production Order ..................................
3.1.2
Vendor Invoice Posting .................................................
Secondary Costs ..........................................................................
3.2.1
Assessment ..................................................................
3.2.2
Activity Conirmation ....................................................
Credits ........................................................................................
3.3.1
Primary Credits .............................................................
3.3.2
Secondary Credits .........................................................
Post Actual Costs ........................................................................
3.4.1
Create Production Order ...............................................
3.4.2
Conirm Activities .........................................................
3.4.3
Default Activities ..........................................................
3.4.4
Operation Sequence .....................................................
Report Actual Costs ....................................................................
Summary ....................................................................................
Types of Variance Calculation ......................................................
4.1.1
Total Variance ...............................................................
4.1.2
Production Variance ......................................................
4.1.3
Planning Variance .........................................................
Variance Coniguration ................................................................
4.2.1
Deine Variance Keys ....................................................
111
111
112
112
113
113
Contents
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
4.7
4.8
5
4.2.2
Deine Default Variance Keys for Plants ........................
4.2.3
Deine Variance Variants ...............................................
4.2.4
Deine Valuation Variant for Scrap and WIP ..................
4.2.5
Deine Target Cost Versions ..........................................
Variance Categories ....................................................................
4.3.1
Input Variances .............................................................
4.3.2
Output Variances ..........................................................
Period End ..................................................................................
4.4.1
Overhead ......................................................................
4.4.2
Work in Process ............................................................
4.4.3
Variance Calculation .....................................................
4.4.4
Settlement ....................................................................
Cost Center Variances .................................................................
4.5.1
Information System .......................................................
4.5.2
Target Cost Analysis ......................................................
4.5.3
Variance Analysis ..........................................................
4.5.4
Actual Price Calculation ................................................
Purchase Price Variance ..............................................................
4.6.1
Master Data ..................................................................
4.6.2
Coniguration ................................................................
4.6.3
Reporting .....................................................................
Actual Costing/Material Ledger ...................................................
Summary ....................................................................................
115
115
117
118
122
123
125
128
128
130
136
144
147
147
151
154
158
163
164
165
166
172
172
Scrap Variance ........................................................................... 175
5.1
5.2
5.3
Scrap Basics ................................................................................
Assembly Scrap ...........................................................................
5.2.1
Assembly Scrap Deinition ............................................
5.2.2
Effect of Assembly Scrap on Quantities .........................
5.2.3
Assembly Scrap Master Data .........................................
5.2.4
Planned Assembly Scrap Costs ......................................
5.2.5
Actual Assembly Scrap Costs .........................................
5.2.6
Variance Calculation .....................................................
5.2.7
Assembly Scrap Target/Actual .......................................
Component Scrap .......................................................................
5.3.1
Component Scrap Deinition .........................................
5.3.2
Effect of Component Scrap on Quantities ......................
5.3.3
Component Scrap Master Data .....................................
175
177
177
177
178
179
181
182
183
187
187
187
188
9
Contents
5.4
5.5
5.6
6
189
190
193
193
197
197
198
199
200
202
203
204
208
208
209
209
211
212
212
215
Reporting .................................................................................. 217
6.1
6.2
6.3
6.4
6.5
6.6
6.7
6.8
10
5.3.4
Planned Component Scrap Costs ...................................
5.3.5
Actual Component Scrap Costs .....................................
5.3.6
Variance Calculation .....................................................
5.3.7
Component Scrap Target/Actual ....................................
Operation Scrap ..........................................................................
5.4.1
Operation Scrap Deinition ...........................................
5.4.2
Effect of Operation Scrap on Quantities ........................
5.4.3
Operation Scrap Master Data ........................................
5.4.4
Planned Operation Scrap Costs .....................................
5.4.5
Actual Operation Scrap Costs ........................................
5.4.6
Variance Calculation .....................................................
5.4.7
Operation Scrap Target/Actual ......................................
Combined Scrap ..........................................................................
5.5.1
Component Scrap .........................................................
5.5.2
Component and Operation Scrap ..................................
5.5.3
Component, Operation, and Assembly Scrap ................
5.5.4
BOM Item Operation Scrap ..........................................
5.5.5
Operation and Assembly Scrap .....................................
5.5.6
Calculate Assembly Scrap ..............................................
Summary ....................................................................................
Summarized Analysis Reports ......................................................
6.1.1
Product Drilldown Reports ...........................................
6.1.2
Summarization Hierarchy Reports .................................
Detailed Reports .........................................................................
Line Item Reports .......................................................................
Production Order Reports ...........................................................
6.4.1
Order Information System .............................................
6.4.2
Order Selection .............................................................
Cost Center Reports ....................................................................
Summary ....................................................................................
Guide Summary ..........................................................................
Looking Ahead ...........................................................................
218
220
227
235
237
239
239
242
244
246
247
249
Contents
Appendices ..................................................................................... 251
A
B
C
D
Glossary ...............................................................................................
Bibliography .........................................................................................
Additional Resources ............................................................................
The Author ...........................................................................................
Index
....................................................................................................
253
273
275
279
281
11
5
Scrap Variance
In Chapter 4, we analyzed all scrap categories in detail, except for scrap variance.
Processing scrap and analyzing scrap variances has its own chapter because there
is more involved in master data settings and cost estimate analysis than in any of
the other variance categories.
In this chapter, we’ll analyze scrap processing and scrap variance analysis in detail.
We’ll discuss scrap basics, types of scrap, and master data settings; carry out plan
and actual scrap postings; and then analyze scrap postings in detailed reports. The
method we use for analyzing scrap variance in this chapter can be used as a model
for analyzing variances in general.
5.1
Scrap Basics
Because no production process is perfect, there is always some percentage of scrap
produced. Assemblies or components that do not meet quality standards may either
become scrap or require rework. Depending on the problem, cheaper items may
become scrap, while more costly assemblies may justify rework.
Case Scenario
The mounting holes for a metal plate are accidentally drilled larger than they were supposed to be. Filling the holes with weld and re-drilling correctly sized holes would cost
more than the plate is worth. The plate is scrapped, and a new plate is drilled correctly
and delivered to inventory. Statistics show that 1 in every 10 plates is drilled incorrectly,
so you plan 10% assembly scrap for the drilled metal plate.
A drilled metal plate is issued from inventory as a component in a higher-level assembly,
and during inspection, before production use, the mounting holes are found to be oversize.
The plate is discarded, and another plate is issued from inventory. Statistics show that
1 in every 50 drilled plates issued from inventory is drilled incorrectly and discarded, so
you plan 2% component scrap for the drilled metal plate.
You enter both 10% assembly scrap and 2% component scrap in the material master
MRP views of the drilled plate.
175
5
Scrap Variance
If the plates were made of an expensive metal alloy that is not readily available, it may
be cost effective to rework the oversize holes by welding and re-drilling. In this case,
you do not plan scrap.
Scrap is different from other losses during the manufacturing of a product because
it can be analyzed and predicted. You can enter and store known scrap amounts in
master data as planned scrap percentages. Scrap percentages increase the planned
manufacturing costs of a product, via the released cost estimate and standard price.
If actual scrap equals planned scrap, no variance occurs because postings are as
planned. Beneits of planning for scrap include the following:
EE
Margin analysis is more accurate.
EE
Variances highlight processes that need analysis.
EE
Production resources can be more accurately planned.
EE
Cost of sales more accurately relect manufacturing costs.
Target and actual scrap costs are calculated from plan scrap quantity and actual
scrap quantity posted during activity conirmation. Scrap variance is calculated
and subtracted from total variances and is displayed in a scrap variance column
in cost reports. A requirement to display the scrap variance column is to activate
scrap calculation and reporting in the variance key and variance variant, as we
examined in Chapter 4.
There are three different types of scrap that can be planned for:
EE
Assembly scrap
This includes the entire cost of faulty or lost assemblies in the cost of sales. The
plan quantity of the assembly is increased.
EE
Component scrap
This includes the cost of faulty or lost individual components in the cost of sales.
The plan quantity of components is increased.
EE
Operation scrap
This optimizes the use of valuable components. The plan quantity of components
in subsequent operations is decreased.
Now that we’ve covered scrap basics, let’s discuss each of the three different types
of scrap in detail.
176
Assembly Scrap
5.2
Assembly Scrap
Assembly scrap includes the entire cost of faulty or lost assemblies in the cost
of sales. If assembly scrap is not planned, all scrap costs post in other variance
categories. Although variance can be included at a higher level in proitability
reporting, planned assembly scrap is included at the material or gross proit level,
as we discussed in Chapter 3. This results in more accurate analysis of proitability
at the product level.
5.2.1
Assembly Scrap Definition
Assembly scrap can be deined as the percentage of assembly quantity that does
not meet required production quality standards. For example, planned assembly
scrap of 25% means that in order to deliver 100 pieces of an assembly, you plan to
produce 125. Planned assembly scrap also improves the MRP process by ensuring
you start with an increased quantity in order to achieve the required product yield.
Assembly scrap is considered an output scrap because it affects the planned output
quantity of items in the production process.
5.2.2
Effect of Assembly Scrap on Quantities
Scrap quantities are important because they cause scrap values. Let’s follow a simple
example of how assembly scrap applied at the assembly level affects lower-level
component and activity quantities.
Example
You plan to produce 100 inished printed circuit boards (PCBs). If planned assembly scrap
is entered for the inished PCBs, all component and activity quantities are increased by
10%, as highlighted in the Quantity costed column in Figure 5.1.
Finished PCBs
Blank PCBs
BIOS
Operation 1
Processor
Operation 2
Quantity
no scrap
Quantity
costed
Assembly
scrap
100 PC
100 PC
100 PC
100 h
100 PC
100 h
100 PC
110 PC
110 PC
110 h
110 PC
110 h
0 PC
10 PC
10 PC
10 h
10 PC
10 h
Figure 5.1 Effect of Assembly Scrap on Component and Activity Quantities
177
5.2
5
Scrap Variance
By increasing the quantity of components and activities, assembly scrap increases the
plan cost of producing the inished PCBs. MRP will propose a production quantity of
110 PC (pieces), with the expectation that 100 PC will be delivered to inventory, and
10 PC will be conirmed as scrap.
Now that we know what assembly scrap is and how it affects scrap quantities, we’ll
investigate how to plan assembly scrap in the next section.
5.2.3
Assembly Scrap Master Data
You can plan assembly scrap in two different master data ields. The most commonly
used ield is located in the MRP 1 view of the material master, which you access
with Transaction MM02 or via menu path Logistics • Materials Management •
Material Master • Material • Change • Immediately. Click on the MRP 1 tab to
display the screen shown in Figure 5.2.
Figure 5.2
Assembly Scrap Field in MRP 1 View
Fill in the Assembly scrap (%) ield with a lat rate percentage determined by your
production statistics of scrap rates, which is 10.00% in this example. You should
update this ield prior to each costing run if the statistics change during the current
year. Later, in Section 5.2, we’ll examine how assembly scrap affects standard cost
estimates.
Another master data ield that controls assembly scrap is located in the Basic Data
tab of a BOM item. You can view or change BOM item details with Transaction
CS02 or via menu path Logistics • Production • Master Data • Bills of Material • Bill of Material • Material BOM • Change. Double-click on a BOM item
to display BOM item details, as shown in Figure 5.3.
178
Assembly Scrap
Figure 5.3
Inspect Net ID Indicator of BOM Component
You can select the Net ID checkbox to ignore assembly scrap for this component.
This is useful if you need to enter a scrap percentage for a particular component
that is different from the assembly scrap percentage of the assembly. In this case,
select the Net ID checkbox, and ill in the percentage scrap for the component in
either the Operation scrap in % or Component scrap (%) ields. If you make an
entry in the Component scrap (%) ield without selecting the Net ID checkbox,
assembly scrap is calculated irst, and then component scrap is calculated in addition, as discussed in detail in Section 5.3.
5.2.4
Planned Assembly Scrap Costs
Planned assembly scrap costs are included in the standard cost estimate. Let’s
compare two cost estimates, one without assembly scrap, and one with assembly
scrap, to highlight the difference. To display the screen shown in Figure 5.4, use
Transaction CK13N or menu path Accounting • Controlling • Product Cost
Controlling • Product Cost Planning • Material Costing • Cost Estimate
with Quantity Structure.
Figure 5.4
Cost Estimate without Assembly Scrap
179
5.2
5
Scrap Variance
The Total value of the STANDARD FG cost estimate without assembly scrap is
46,254.68. The igures in the Scrap and Scrap quantity columns indicate there is
no planned output scrap. Now let’s display a cost estimate for material STANDARD
FG with 10% assembly scrap planned, as shown in Figure 5.5.
Figure 5.5
Cost Estimate with Assembly Scrap
The Total value of the STANDARD FG cost estimate with assembly scrap is
50,880.14, which is 10% higher than the cost estimate without assembly scrap.
This is because the quantity of all components has increased by 10%, illustrated by
comparing the Quantity columns in both cost estimates. The increase in component quantities is shown in the Scrap quantity column, while the corresponding
increase in value is shown in the Scrap column. While only material cost estimates
are displayed in Figure 5.5, the quantity and value of all other cost estimate items,
such as activities, are also increased by 10%.
Tip
To quickly determine if assembly scrap is included in a cost estimate, click on the
cost estimate Qty Struct. (quantity structure) tab, which displays the screen shown
in Figure 5.6.
Figure 5.6
“Assembly Scrap Only” Text in Cost Estimate
The Assembly Scrap Only text indicates assembly scrap is included in the cost
estimate, without the need to refer to the MRP 1 view of the material master.
Information text also appears in the same tab if operation scrap is included in the
cost estimate, as discussed later in Section 5.4.
180
Assembly Scrap
Now that we’ve looked at planning for assembly scrap with master data entries and
the effect on cost estimates, let’s examine how actual scrap postings occur.
5.2.5
Actual Assembly Scrap Costs
Actual scrap costs usually occur during production order activity conirmation. This
is when activities are conirmed, and goods movements occur during backlushing and auto goods receipt, as discussed in detail in Chapter 3. We’ll now create a
production order and carry out a conirmation to demonstrate how actual assembly
scrap costs occur.
You create a production order with Transaction CO01 or via menu path Logistics •
Production • Production Control • Order • Create • With Material. The screen
shown in Figure 5.7 is displayed.
Figure 5.7
Production Order Quantity Increased by Planned Assembly Scrap
The production order quantity is automatically increased by 10% due to assembly
scrap in the material master MRP 1 view, as discussed in Section 5.2. MRP proposes
a total quantity of 1,100.000, as shown in the Total quant. ield, even though
only 1,000.000 are required. This is because a conirmed scrap assembly quantity
of 100.000 is expected, as shown in the Scrap portion ield.
Actual assembly scrap is posted during production order conirmation. In Chapter
3, we saw a conirmation per operation. In this example, we’ll follow a conirmation at the order header level with Transaction CO15 or via menu path Logistics •
Production • Production Control • Conirmation • Enter • For Order. The
screen shown in Figure 5.8 is displayed.
181
5.2
5
Scrap Variance
Figure 5.8
Conirmation Screen and Conirmed Scrap Field
A quantity of 100.000, due to planned assembly scrap, defaults in the Conirmed
scrap ield in the Current conirm. column. If the default Conirmed scrap quantity is manually changed, a scrap variance will result. The expected scrap quantity
of 100.000 is displayed in the Total to conirm column of the Conirmed scrap
row.
After scrap is conirmed, you will carry out variance calculation next, as we will
discuss in the following section.
5.2.6
Variance Calculation
You carry out variance calculation with Transactions KKS6 (individual) and KKS5
(collective) or via menu path Accounting • Controlling • Product Cost Controlling • Cost Object Controlling • Product Cost by Period • Period-End
Closing • Single Functions: Product Cost Collector • Variances. The screen
shown in Figure 5.9 is displayed following variance calculation.
Note
You carry out variance analysis for production and process orders with Transactions KKS2
(individual) and KKS1 (collective).
Figure 5.9
182
Variance Calculation Scrap Output Screen
Assembly Scrap
Assembly scrap maintains the expected Actual qty (last column) delivered to
inventory at 1,000.000 by increasing the manufactured quantity. After the planned
assembly scrap quantity is actually conirmed as scrap, the output quantity is the
quantity required.
The unfavorable Scrap variance of 4,625.48 indicates that assembly scrap was
posted but not planned for in this example. Scrap variance is subtracted from total
variance during variance calculation, which simpliies the task of analyzing total
variance. Click on the Scrap button (not shown) in the variance calculation output
screen to display details of the scrap variance by cost element and operation.
Now that we’ve examined how to plan and post actual scrap and calculate variance,
let’s look at how to report and analyze scrap postings.
5.2.7
Assembly Scrap Target/Actual
During a period, or at period end, you may need to carry out further detailed
analysis of scrap variance. Before doing so, you should irst run a variance calculation to determine the target costs. You can display and analyze target versus actual
costs in detailed product cost collector reports with Transaction PKBC_PKO or
via menu path Accounting • Controlling • Product Cost Controlling • Cost
Object Controlling • Product Cost by Period • Information System • Reports
for Product Cost by Period • Detailed Reports. A similar report is available for
production and process orders with Transaction PKBC_ORD.
Let’s compare a series of three detailed reports to demonstrate how assembly scrap
affects variance.
Assembly Scrap Not Planned and Actual Scrap Posted
The irst detailed report contains an unfavorable scrap variance because assembly
scrap is not planned, while actual scrap is posted, as shown in Figure 5.10.
Because assembly scrap is not planned, actual assembly scrap posts as an unfavorable
scrap variance with a value of 4,625.48, as shown in the Scrap column.
183
5.2
5
Scrap Variance
Figure 5.10 Assembly Scrap Not Planned and Actual Scrap Posted
Activity and component quantities to make 1,100.000 STANDARD FG are issued
from inventory, as shown in the Total act.qty column. This corresponds to the
value of 50,880.14 in the Debit row and Ttl actual (total actual costs) column.
A quantity of 1,000.000 STANDARD FG is delivered to inventory, as shown in the
Total act.qty (last) column. This corresponds to the credit value of 46,254.68 in
the Delivery row and Ttl actual column.
Because the total actual debits of 50,880.14 are greater than the total actual credits
of 46,254.68, an unfavorable variance of 4,625.46 results, as shown in the summary
(last) row of the Total actual column.
Now that we’ve looked at how posting assembly scrap without planning for it
results in an unfavorable variance, let’s see the consequences of planning but not
posting assembly scrap.
Assembly Scrap Planned and Actual Scrap Not Posted
Compare the report in the previous section with an unfavorable scrap variance to a
report in this section with a favorable scrap variance that results from planning but
not posting assembly scrap, as shown in Figure 5.11.
Because assembly scrap is planned, all planned scrap that is not actually posted
results in a favorable scrap variance, with a value of 4,625.50- as seen in the Scrap
column in Figure 5.11.
184
Assembly Scrap
Figure 5.11 Assembly Scrap Planned and Actual Scrap Not Posted
Activity and component quantities needed to make 1,000.000 STANDARD FG
are issued from inventory, as shown in the Total act.qty (last) column. This corresponds to the value of 46,254.68 in the Debit row and Ttl actual (total actual)
costs column.
A quantity of 1,000.000 STANDARD FG is delivered to inventory, as shown in the
Total act.qty column. This corresponds to the credit value of 50,880.14- in the
Delivery row and Ttl actual column. The credit value is based on the standard
cost estimate, which contains the costs for making 1,100 assemblies, because
assembly scrap is planned.
Because total actual debits of 46,254.68 are less than the total actual credits of
50,880.14, a favorable variance of 4,625.46- is shown in the summary (last) row
of the Total actual column.
Now that we’ve looked at how posting assembly scrap without planning for it
results in an unfavorable variance, and how planning assembly scrap and not actually posting it results in a favorable variance, let’s see the effect of both planning
and posting assembly scrap.
Assembly Scrap Planned and Actual Scrap Posted
Compare the reports in the previous two sections with unfavorable and favorable
scrap variances to the report in this section with no scrap variance, which results
from planning assembly scrap and posting actual scrap, as shown in Figure 5.12.
185
5.2
5
Scrap Variance
Figure 5.12 Assembly Scrap Planned and Actual Scrap Posted
Because assembly scrap is planned and actual scrap is posted, only rounding differences of 0.04- remain in the Scrap variance column.
Activity and component quantities needed to make 1,100.000 standard FG are
issued from inventory, as shown in the SFG row and Total act.qty column. This
corresponds to the value of 50,880.13 in the Debit row and Ttl actual (total
actual costs) column.
A quantity of 1,000.000 standard FG is delivered to inventory, as shown in the
standard FG row and Total act.qty column. This corresponds to the credit value
of 50,880.14- in the Delivery row and Total actual column. The credit value is
based on the standard cost estimate, which contains the costs for making 1,100
assemblies, because assembly scrap is planned.
Because total actual debits of 50,880.13 are nearly equal to total actual credits of
50,880.14, variance is nearly eliminated, as shown by the 0.01- in the summary
(last) row of the Total tgt column.
Total variance ideally should only include unplanned production costs. If you don’t
plan scrap, all scrap costs will post as a scrap variance, as demonstrated earlier in
Figure 5.10. When you plan assembly scrap based on production statistics, scrap
costs are separated from variance, and only the difference between plan and actual
scrap costs posts as a variance, as shown in Figure 5.12.
Now that we’ve examined assembly scrap, let’s look at the next type of scrap:
component scrap.
186
Component Scrap
5.3
Component Scrap
Component scrap includes the cost of faulty or lost components in the cost of sales. A
case scenario involving component scrap was presented in Section 5.1. If component
scrap is not planned, all component scrap costs post as a variance. Although variance can be included at a higher level in proitability reporting, planned component
scrap is included at the material or gross proit level as discussed in Chapter 3. This
results in more accurate analysis of proitability at the product level.
5.3.1
Component Scrap Definition
Component scrap can be deined as the percentage of component quantity that
does not meet required production quality standards before being inserted in the
production process. Planned component scrap is treated as additional consumption of the relevant component. Planned component scrap also improves the MRP
process by ensuring that you start with an increased component quantity in order
to achieve the required product yield. Component scrap is an input scrap because
it is detected before use in the production process.
5.3.2
Effect of Component Scrap on Quantities
Scrap quantities are important because they cause scrap values. Let’s follow a
simple example of how component scrap applied at the component level affects
component quantities. We’ll also examine the interaction between component
and assembly scrap.
Example
When planning to produce 100 inished PCBs, assembly scrap is calculated irst, and
component scrap is calculated second. Assembly scrap applied to the inished PCBs
increases all component and activity quantities by 10%, as shown in the outlined Quantity
costed column in Figure 5.13.
Finished PCBs
Blank PCBs
BIOS
Operation 1
Processor
Operation 2
Quantity
no scrap
100 PC
100 PC
100 PC
100 h
100 PC
100 h
Quantity
costed
100 PC
110 PC
110 PC
110 h
116 PC
110 h
Assembly
scrap
0 PC
10 PC
10 PC
10 h
10 PC
10 h
Component
scrap
0 PC
0 PC
0 PC
6 PC
-
Figure 5.13 Component Scrap Increases Component Quantities
187
5.3
5
Scrap Variance
A component scrap of 5% applied to the Processor component increases the Quantity
costed from 110 to 116, as shown in the outlined Processor row in Figure 5.13. Because
component scrap is applied after assembly scrap, the Component scrap quantity is 6
PC.
Assembly and component scrap increase the plan cost of producing inished PCBs by
increasing the plan quantity of components and activities. MRP will propose a production
quantity of 110 assemblies, with the expectation that 100 will be delivered to inventory
and 10 conirmed as scrap. MRP will also propose the consumption of a quantity of
116 PC of the Processor component, even though only 100 would be needed without
planned scrap.
Now that we know what component scrap is and how it affects quantities, let’s
look at how to plan component scrap.
5.3.3
Component Scrap Master Data
You can plan component scrap in two different master data ields. The most commonly used ield is located in the MRP 4 view of the material master, which
you can access with Transaction MM02 or via menu path Logistics • Materials
Management • Material Master • Material • Change • Immediately. Navigate
to the MRP 4 tab to display the screen shown in Figure 5.14.
Figure 5.14 Component Scrap Field in the MRP 4 View of Component
Fill in the Component scrap (%) ield with a lat rate percentage determined by
your production statistics of scrap rates. You should update this ield prior to each
costing run if the statistics change during the current year. Later in Section 5.3,
we’ll examine how component scrap affects standard cost estimates.
Another ield used to plan component scrap is located in the Basic Data tab of the
BOM item. You can view or change BOM item details with Transaction CS02 or
via menu path Logistics • Production • Master Data • Bills of Material • Bill
of Material • Material BOM • Change. Double-click on a BOM item to display
the BOM item details, as shown in Figure 5.15.
188
Component Scrap
Figure 5.15 Component Scrap Field in BOM Item Details
An entry in the Component scrap (%) ield in the BOM item takes priority over an
entry in the material master, MRP 4 view. Fill in the Component scrap (%) ield with
a lat rate percentage determined by your production statistics of scrap rates.
Case Scenario
A component is used in many assemblies, and generally the component scrap rate is 10%,
which is entered in the material master MRP 4 view of the component. One assembly
is manufactured close to the inventory store, and only 5% of components are lost or
damaged on the way to production of this assembly. A component scrap rate of 5% is
entered in the component BOM item for this particular assembly. The component scrap
rate of 5% in the BOM item takes priority over the 10% component scrap rate entered
in the material master MRP 4 view of the assembly.
You should update this ield prior to each costing run if the statistics change during the current year. We’ll examine how component scrap affects standard cost
estimates in the next section.
5.3.4
Planned Component Scrap Costs
Planned component scrap costs are included in the standard cost estimate. Let’s
compare two cost estimates, one without component scrap, and one with component
scrap, to highlight the difference. To display the screen shown in Figure 5.16, use
Transaction CK13N or menu path Accounting • Controlling • Product Cost
Controlling • Product Cost Planning • Material Costing • Cost Estimate
with Quantity Structure.
189
5.3
5
Scrap Variance
Figure 5.16 Cost Estimate without Component Scrap
The Total value of the standard fg cost estimate without component scrap is
46,254.68. The igures in the Scrap and Scrap quantity columns indicate that
there is no planned output scrap. Now let’s display a cost estimate for material
standard fg with 10% component scrap entered in the material master MRP 4
view, as shown in Figure 5.17.
Figure 5.17 Cost Estimate with Component Scrap
The Total value of the standard fg cost estimate with component scrap is
48,581.82, which is higher than the Total value of 46,254.68 of the cost estimate without component scrap. This is because the quantity of component SFG
has increased by 10%, as shown by comparing the Quantity columns in both cost
estimates. The Total value of component SFG has increased by 10% due to the
increase in Quantity.
The increase in component quantity is not shown in the Scrap quantity column.
Component scrap is an input quantity variance, not an output scrap variance. Later
in this section, we’ll explore how to analyze component scrap in detail.
5.3.5
Actual Component Scrap Costs
Actual scrap costs usually occur during production order conirmation. This is when
activities are conirmed and goods movements occur during backlushing and auto
goods receipt, as discussed in detail in Chapter 3. Let’s now create a production
order and carry out a conirmation to demonstrate how actual component scrap
costs occur.
190
Component Scrap
You create a production order with Transaction CO01 or via menu path Logistics • Production • Shop Floor Control • Order • Create • With Material.
To display the component overview screen shown in Figure 5.18, from the initial
production order header screen, select Goto • Overviews • Components from
the menu bar.
Figure 5.18 Production Order Component Quantities Increased by Planned Component Scrap
Component SFG quantity is automatically increased by 10% due to component scrap
in the material master MRP 4 view, as we discussed earlier in Section 5.3. MRP
proposes a total quantity of 1,100.000, as shown in the Reqmts qty (requirements
quantity) column in the SFG row, even though only 1,000 are required according
to the BOM quantities. This is because it is expected that 100 of the components
will be lost or damaged on the way to the production line or will not pass inspection for some reason.
Actual component scrap is posted during production order conirmation. In Chapter 3, we looked at a conirmation per operation. In this example, we’ll look at a
conirmation at the order header level with Transaction CO15, or via menu path
Logistics • Production • Shop Floor Control • Conirmation • Enter • For
Order. The screen shown in Figure 5.19 is displayed.
191
5.3
5
Scrap Variance
Figure 5.19 Conirmation Screen with Component Scrap Planned
Only output scrap, such as assembly or operation scrap, is entered in the Conirmed
scrap ield. There is no expected output scrap to conirm, as shown at the Total
to conirm column of the Conirmed scrap row. Click on the Goods movements
button to display the goods movements screen shown in Figure 5.20.
Figure 5.20
Conirmation Goods Movements Screen
A Quantity of 1,100.000 for Material 300002252 (SFG) defaults from the production order. The production order quantity of component SFG was increased
10% due to component scrap entered in the material master MRP 4 view. If you
manually adjust the default component quantity shown in Figure 5.20, you will
introduce an unplanned input quantity variance.
After scrap is conirmed, you carry out variance calculation, as discussed in the
next section.
192
Component Scrap
5.3.6
Variance Calculation
Variance calculation is done using Transactions KKS6 (individual) and KKS5 (collective) or via menu path Accounting • Controlling • Product Cost Controlling •
Cost Object Controlling • Product Cost by Period • Period-End Closing •
Single Functions: Product Cost Collector • Variances. The screen shown in
Figure 5.21 is displayed following variance calculation. You carry out variance
analysis for production and process orders with Transactions KKS2 (individual)
and KKS1 (collective).
Figure 5.21
Component Scrap Displays as Input Quantity Variance
There is no scrap variance because component scrap is categorized as an input
quantity variance, as shown by the 2,327.14 value in the Input qty var. (input
quantity variance) column. Detailed variance analysis for component scrap occurs
in product cost collector reports, as explained in the next section.
5.3.7
Component Scrap Target/Actual
During a period or at period end, you may need to carry out further detailed
analysis of scrap variance. Before doing so, you should irst run variance calculation
to update the target costs. You can display and analyze plan versus actual costs in
detailed product cost collector reports with Transaction PKBC_PKO or via menu
path Accounting • Controlling • Product Cost Controlling • Cost Object
Controlling • Product Cost by Period • Information System • Reports for
Product Cost by Period • Detailed Reports. A similar report is available for
production and process orders with Transaction PKBC_ORD.
Let’s compare three detailed reports to demonstrate how component scrap affects
variance.
Component Scrap Not Planned and Actual Scrap Posted
The irst product cost collector report contains an unfavorable scrap variance
because component scrap is not planned while actual scrap is posted, as shown
in Figure 5.22.
193
5.3
5
Scrap Variance
Figure 5.22
Component Scrap Not Planned and Actual Scrap Posted
Because component scrap is not planned, actual component scrap posts as an unfavorable input quantity variance, with a value of 2,327.14 in the Variance (total
variance) and Qty variance (input quantity variance) columns.
A component quantity needed to make 1,100.000 STANDARD FG is issued from
inventory, as shown in the Total act.qty column. This corresponds to the value
of 25,598.54 in the SFG row and Ttl actual (total actual costs) column.
Because the standard cost estimate doesn’t contain planned component scrap,
the component target value of 23,271.40 in the SFG row in the Total tgt (total
target costs) column is 10% less than the component actual value of 25,598.54.
This results in an unfavorable variance of 2,327.14, as shown in the Debit row of
the Qty variance column.
Overall, because total actual debits of 48,581.82 are greater than total actual credits
of 46,254.68, the result is an unfavorable variance of 2,327.14 in the summary
(last) row of the Total actual column.
Now that we’ve looked at how posting component scrap without planning for it
results in an unfavorable variance, let’s see the effect of planning but not posting
component scrap.
Component Scrap Planned and Actual Scrap Not Posted
Compare the report in the previous section with an unfavorable variance to a report
in this section with a favorable variance, which results from planning component
scrap but not posting an actual increase in component quantity, as shown in Figure
5.23.
194
Component Scrap
Figure 5.23
Component Scrap Planned and Actual Scrap Not Posted
Because component scrap is planned, all planned scrap that’s not actually posted
results in a favorable variance with a value of 2,327.14- in the Qty variance (input
quantity variance) column.
A component quantity needed to make 1,000.000 STANDARD FG is issued from
inventory, as shown in the Total act.qty column, and there is no increase in component quantity. This corresponds to the component actual value of 23,271.40 in
the SFG row and Ttl actual (total actual costs) column. This results in total actual
debits of 46,254.68, as shown in the Debit row and the Ttl actual column.
Because the standard cost estimate contains 10% planned component scrap, the
component target value of 25,598.54 in the SFG row in the Total tgt (total target
costs) column is 10% greater than the component actual value of 23,271.40. This
results in a favorable variance of 2,327.14-, as shown in the Debit row and Qty
variance column.
Overall, because total actual debits of 46,254.68 are less than total actual total
credits of 48,581.82, the result is a favorable variance of 2,327.14- in the summary
row of the Total actual column.
Now that we’ve looked at how posting component scrap without planning for it
results in an unfavorable variance, and how planning component scrap and not
actually posting it results in a favorable variance, let’s see the effect of both planning and posting component scrap.
195
5.3
5
Scrap Variance
Component Scrap Planned and Actual Scrap Posted
Compare the reports in the previous two sections with unfavorable and favorable
variances to the report in this section with no variance, since component scrap is
planned and actual component quantity is posted, as shown in Figure 5.24.
Figure 5.24
Component Scrap Planned and Actual Scrap Posted
Because component scrap is planned, and actual component quantities are posted
as planned, no variances remain in the Variance or Qty var. columns.
A component quantity needed to make 1,100.000 of STANDARD FG is issued
from inventory, as shown in the Total act.qty column of the SFG row. This corresponds to the value of 25,598.54 in the Ttl actual (total actual costs) column
of the SFG row.
Because the standard cost estimate contains 10% planned component scrap, the
component target value of 25,598.54 in the SFG row in the Total tgt (total target
costs) column is the same as the component actual value of 25,598.54. This results
in a value of 0.00 in the Qty variance column of the Debit row.
Overall, because total actual debits of 48,581.82 are equal to total actual credits
of 48,581.82, the result is a value of 0.00 in the summary row of the Ttl actual
column.
Total variance ideally should only include unplanned production costs. If you
don’t plan scrap, all scrap costs will post as a variance, as demonstrated in Figure
5.22. When you plan component scrap based on production statistics, scrap costs
are included in the cost estimate, and only the difference between plan and actual
component scrap costs posts as an input quantity variance, as demonstrated in
Figure 5.24.
196
Operation Scrap
Now that we’ve examined assembly and component scrap, let’s look at the third
type of scrap: operation scrap.
5.4
Operation Scrap
Planned operation scrap includes the entire cost of faulty or lost assemblies in the cost
of sales. If operation scrap is not planned, all scrap costs post as a variance. Although
variances can be included at a higher level in proitability reporting, planned operation scrap is included at the material or gross proit level, as we discussed in Chapter
3. This results in more accurate analysis of proitability at the product level.
5.4.1
Operation Scrap Definition
Operation scrap can be deined as the percentage of assembly quantity that does
not meet required production quality standards. For example, planned operation
scrap of 20% means that if you start an operation with 125 pieces, you will lose
20% (25 pieces) during the operation. One hundred pieces will be available for the
subsequent operation. Operation scrap is an output scrap because it reduces the
planned output quantity in the production process.
Operation scrap has different effects on quantities, depending on whether it is
entered in the routing, BOM item, or both. We’ll now discuss the three possible
options in the following subsections.
Operation Scrap in Routing
Operation scrap entered in the routing ensures that faulty assemblies are discarded
before valuable components are inserted. The output quantity of assembly operations is reduced by the operation scrap amount before valuable components are
inserted in a subsequent operation. This reduces wastage of valuable components
discarded in assemblies.
Case Scenario
A music CD packaging facility inspects a CD case for scratches in operation 010 and
inserts a CD in the case in operation 020. Operation scrap of 20% is applied at operation
010. For every 100 CD cases inspected, 20 are discarded, and CDs are inserted in 80 CD
cases in operation 020. Because CDs are more expensive than cases, damaged cases are
discarded before inserting the CDs.
197
5.4
5
Scrap Variance
However, the manufacturer still has a requirement to assemble 100 CDs in cases. Planned
assembly scrap of 25% is added to the assembly material master. MRP generates a requirement for inspection of 125 cases in operation 010, and 20%, or 25 cases, are discarded
due to operation scrap. One hundred cases are available for operation 020.
Now that we’ve discussed operation scrap entered in routings, let’s see how operation scrap entered in BOM items works.
Operation Scrap in BOM Item
Operation scrap entered in the BOM item ensures the input quantity of valuable
components inserted in an assembly is reduced. Assembly scrap entered in the
material master of the assembly can be ignored by selecting a net checkbox. This
allows close control over the planning and use of individual valuable components
in an assembly. This may also be useful when a component can be salvaged and
reused, even if the assembly does not pass quality inspection. If BOM operation
scrap is not entered, assembly scrap from the material master is used.
Operation Scrap in Operation and BOM Item
Operation scrap entered in both the routing and BOM item reduces the output
quantity of an assembly before valuable components are inserted in the next
operation. It also controls the input quantity of individual valuable components
in the assembly.
Routing operation scrap refers to the activity quantity used, while BOM operation
scrap refers to the material quantity used.
5.4.2
Effect of Operation Scrap on Quantities
Scrap quantities are important because they cause scrap values. Let’s follow a simple
example of how operation scrap applied at the operation level affects component
and activity quantities.
You begin a process with 100 inished PCBs. If planned operation scrap of 10% is
entered in the irst operation, and 20% is entered in the second operation in the
routing of the inished PCB, a quantity of 72 inished PCBs will be available at the
end of the second operation, as shown in Figure 5.25.
198
Operation Scrap
Plan:
100 PC
Routing
BOM
Input
quantity
Blank PCBs
BIOS
100 PC
100 PC
For output of
100, enter
assembly
scrap in
finished PCB
Operation 100
scrap 10% -10
Operation 1
Install/test
Operation
scrap 20%
(100 h)
Component
scrap 4 %
Operation 2 Processor
104 PC
Install/test
Component quantity needs to be
(90 h)
reduced by BOM operation scrap
90
-18
Finished PCBs
Figure 5.25
72 PC
Operation Scrap Reduces Operation Output
By decreasing operation output quantity, operation scrap increases the cost of
producing the inished PCBs. MRP will propose a production quantity of 100
assemblies, with the expectation that 72 PC will be delivered to inventory, and 28
partial assemblies will be conirmed as scrap. No operation scrap is entered in the
BOM item in this example.
Now that we know what operation scrap is and how it affects scrap quantities,
we’ll investigate how to plan operation scrap.
5.4.3
Operation Scrap Master Data
You can plan operation scrap in two master data ields. The most commonly used
ield is located in the routing operation details view. To enter operation scrap, as
displayed in Figure 5.26, use Transaction CA02 or menu path Logistics • Production • Master Data • Routings • Routings • Standard Routings.
Figure 5.26
Operation Scrap Field in Operation Details
199
5.4
5
Scrap Variance
You enter operation scrap in the Scrap in % ield of the General data section of
the routing operation details screen.
Another ield used to plan operation scrap is located in the Basic Data tab of the
BOM item. You can view or change BOM item details with Transaction CS02 or
via menu path Logistics • Production • Master Data • Bills of Material • Bill
of Material • Material BOM • Change. Double-click on a BOM item to display
BOM item details, as shown in Figure 5.27.
Figure 5.27
Operation Scrap Field in BOM Item
You enter operation scrap in the Operation scrap in % ield of the Basic Data
tab of the BOM item. The Net ID checkbox is selected to ignore assembly scrap,
and it must be selected if you enter operation scrap. For a particular component,
operation scrap allows you to enter a different scrap percentage, usually less than
the assembly scrap percentage.
5.4.4
Planned Operation Scrap Costs
Planned operation scrap costs are included in the standard cost estimate. Let’s
compare two cost estimates, one without operation scrap, and one with operation
scrap, to highlight the difference. To display the screen shown in Figure 5.28, use
Transaction CK13N or menu path Accounting • Controlling • Product Cost
Controlling • Product Cost Planning • Material Costing • Cost Estimate
with Quantity Structure.
200
Operation Scrap
Figure 5.28
Cost Estimate without Operation Scrap
The Total value of the STANDARD FG cost estimate without operation scrap is
46,254.68. The igures in the Scrap and Scrap quantity columns indicate there is
no planned output scrap. Now let’s display a cost estimate for material STANDARD
FG with 10% operation scrap entered in the irst operation of the routing, as shown
in Figure 5.29.
Figure 5.29
Cost Estimate with Operation Scrap
The Total value of the STANDARD FG cost estimate with operation scrap is
46,254.68, the same as without operation scrap. However, the output Quantity of
the cost estimate with operation scrap is reduced by 10%, from 1,000.000 without
operation scrap, to 900.000 with operation scrap. It costs the same to produce
900.000 with operation scrap as it does to produce 1,000.000 without operation
scrap, so per unit cost is increased by operation scrap.
Tip
To quickly determine if operation scrap is included in a cost estimate, click on the cost estimate
Qty Strct. (quantity structure) tab, which displays the screen shown in Figure 5.30.
Figure 5.30
Operation Scrap Only Text in Cost Estimate
201
5.4
5
Scrap Variance
The Operation Scrap Only text indicates that operation scrap is included in the cost
estimate, without the need to refer to operation details. Information text also appears
in the same tab if assembly scrap is included in the cost estimate as discussed in Section
5.2.
Now that we’ve looked at planning for operation scrap with master data entries
and how it affects cost estimates, let’s examine how actual operation scrap postings occur.
5.4.5
Actual Operation Scrap Costs
Actual scrap costs usually occur during production order conirmation. That is
when operation output is either conirmed as yield or as scrap. We’ll now create a
production order and carry out a conirmation to demonstrate how actual operation scrap costs occur.
You create a production order with Transaction CO01 or via menu path Logistics •
Production • Shop Floor Control • Order • Create • With Material. From
the production order header screen, select Goto • Overviews • Operations from
the menu bar to display the operations overview screen. Then double-click on
the operation in which you entered operation scrap in Section 5.4 to display the
production order operation detail screen shown in Figure 5.31.
Figure 5.31
Production Order Operation Scrap Field
Operation Scrap defaults from the routing, as discussed in Section 5.4. Production order total quantity is unchanged by planned operation scrap. MRP proposes
202
Operation Scrap
a quantity of 1,000, with plan yield of 900 and an operation scrap quantity of
100.
Actual operation scrap is posted during production order conirmation. A conirmed
scrap ield is available, and planned operation scrap defaults from the production
order when using conirmation Transaction CO11N or menu path Logistics •
Production • Shop Floor Control • Conirmation • Enter • For Operation •
Time Ticket, as shown in Figure 5.32.
Figure 5.32
Production Order Conirmation Screen Includes Scrap Field
The Planned total yield quantity of 1,000.000 is reduced by default operation
Scrap quantity of 100.000, resulting in a default Yield quantity of 900.000. If
the default operation Scrap quantity is manually changed, a scrap variance will
result.
After scrap is conirmed, you carry out variance calculation, as discussed next.
5.4.6
Variance Calculation
Variance calculation is done using Transactions KKS6 (individual) and KKS5 (collective), or accessing menu path Accounting • Controlling • Product Cost
Controlling • Cost Object Controlling • Product Cost by Period • Period-End
Closing • Single Functions: Product Cost Collector • Variances. The screen
shown in Figure 5.33 is displayed following variance analysis. You carry out variance analysis for production and process orders with Transactions KKS2 (individual)
and KKS1 (collective).
203
5.4
5
Scrap Variance
Figure 5.33
Variance Calculation Output Screen
Operation scrap has reduced the expected Actual qty delivered to inventory to
900.000 from 1,000.000. Operation scrap doesn’t increase the manufactured quantity, so after the planned operation scrap quantity is actually conirmed as scrap, the
output quantity is less than the quantity required. You need to plan assembly scrap
as well as operation scrap in order to output the required quantity, as described in
the case scenario in Section 5.4.
The unfavorable Scrap variance of 4,625.48 indicates that operation scrap was
posted but not planned in this example. Scrap variance is subtracted from total
variance, which simpliies the task of analyzing total variance.
Click on the Scrap button (not shown) in the variance calculation output screen to
display details of the scrap variance by cost element and operation.
Now that we’ve examined how to plan and post actual scrap and calculate variance,
let’s look at how to report and analyze operation scrap postings.
5.4.7
Operation Scrap Target/Actual
During a period or at period end, you may need to do further detailed analysis
of scrap variance. Before analysis during a period, you should irst run variance
calculation to update the target costs. You can display and analyze target versus
actual costs in detailed product cost collector reports with Transaction PKBC_PKO
or via menu path Accounting • Controlling • Product Cost Controlling • Cost
Object Controlling • Product Cost by Period • Information System • Reports
for Product Cost by Period • Detailed Reports. A similar report is available for
production and process orders with Transaction PKBC_ORD.
Let’s compare a series of three detailed reports to demonstrate how operation scrap
affects variance.
Operation Scrap Not Planned and Actual Scrap Posted
The irst report contains an unfavorable scrap variance, which results from not
planning operation scrap, while posting actual scrap, as shown in Figure 5.34.
204
Operation Scrap
Figure 5.34
Operation Scrap Not Planned and Actual Scrap Posted
Because operation scrap is not planned, actual operation scrap posts as an unfavorable variance with a value of 4,625.48 in the Scrap variance column.
Activity and component quantities needed to make 1,000.000 STANDARD FG are
issued from inventory, as shown in the Total act.qty column. This corresponds to
the value of 46,254.68 in the Ttl actual (total actual costs) column of the Debit
row.
A quantity of 900.000 STANDARD FG is delivered to inventory, as shown in the
Total act.qty column. This corresponds to the credit value of 41,629.21- in the
Ttl actual column of the Delivery row.
Because total actual debits of 46,254.68 are greater than the total actual credits of
41,629.21, an unfavorable variance of 4,625.47 results, as shown in the summary
row of the Total actual column.
Now that we’ve looked at how posting operation scrap without planning for it
results in an unfavorable variance, let’s see the effect of planning but not posting
operation scrap.
Operation Scrap Planned and Actual Scrap Not Posted
Compare the report in the previous section with an unfavorable scrap variance to a
report in this section with a favorable scrap variance, which results from planning
component scrap but not posting actual scrap, as shown in Figure 5.35.
205
5.4
5
Scrap Variance
Figure 5.35
Operation Scrap Planned and Actual Scrap Not Posted
Because operation scrap is planned, all planned scrap not actually posted results in
a favorable scrap variance, with a value of 4,625.47- in the Scrap column.
Activity and component quantities needed to make 900.000 STANDARD FG are
issued from inventory, as shown in the Total act.qty column. This corresponds to
the value of 41,629.22 in the Ttl actual (total actual costs) column of the Debit
row.
A quantity of 900.000 STANDARD FG is delivered to inventory, as shown in the
Total act.qty column. This corresponds to the credit value of 46,254.68 in the
Ttl actual column of the Delivery row.
The credit value is based on the standard cost estimate, which contains the costs
for making 1,000 assemblies because operation scrap is planned.
Because total actual debits of 41,629.22 are less than the total actual credits of
46,254.68, a favorable variance of 4,625.46- is shown in the summary row of the
Ttl actual column.
Now that we’ve looked at how posting operation scrap and not planning for it
results in an unfavorable variance, and how planning operation scrap and not actually posting it results in a favorable variance, let’s see the effect of both planning
and posting operation scrap.
206
Operation Scrap
Assembly Scrap Planned and Actual Scrap Posted
Compare the reports in the previous two sections with favorable and unfavorable
scrap variances to the report in this section with no scrap variance, which results
from planning operation scrap and posting actual scrap, as shown in Figure 5.36.
Figure 5.36
Operation Scrap Planned and Actual Scrap Posted
Because operation scrap is planned and actual scrap is posted, scrap variance is
eliminated, as shown in the summary row of the Scrap variance column.
Activity and component quantities needed to make 1,000.000 STANDARD FG are
issued from inventory, as shown in the Total act.qty column. This corresponds to
the value of 46,254.67 in the Ttl actual (total actual costs) column of the Debit
row.
A quantity of 900.000 STANDARD FG is delivered to inventory, as shown in the
Total act.qty column. This corresponds to the credit value of 46,254.68- in the Ttl
actual column of the Delivery row. The credit value is based on the standard cost
estimate, which contains the costs for making 1,000 assemblies because operation
scrap is planned.
Because the total actual debits of 46,254.67 are nearly equal to the total actual
credits of 46,254.68, variance is nearly eliminated, as shown by the 0.01- in the
summary row of the Ttl actual column.
Ideally, total variance should only include unplanned production costs. If you don’t
plan scrap, all assembly and operations scrap costs will post as a scrap variance, as was
demonstrated in Figure 5.34. When you plan operation scrap based on production
207
5.4
5
Scrap Variance
statistics, scrap costs are separated from variance, and only the difference between
plan and actual scrap costs post as a variance, as demonstrated in Figure 5.36.
Now that we’ve carried out a detailed analysis of each of the three types of scrap,
let’s see an example with all three types of scrap combined.
5.5
Combined Scrap
In this section, we’ll follow an example beginning with component scrap, and then
progressively combine all three types of scrap in the following subsections.
5.5.1
Component Scrap
Component scrap increases input component quantity, as shown in Figure 5.37.
Routing
Plan:
100 PC
100 Operation 1
100 Install/test
BOM
Input
quantity
Blank PCBs
Processor
100 PC
100 PC
(100 h)
BIOS
100 Operation 2
100 Install/test
104 PC
Component
scrap 4 %
(100 h)
Finished PCBs
Figure 5.37
100 PC
Component Scrap Increases Component Input Quantity
The BOM requires 100 blank PCBs, 100 processors, and 100 BIOS assemblies to
manufacture 100 inished PCBs. The routing for the inished PCBs contains two
operations that consume production activities. The blank PCBs and processors are
assembled in operation 1, and the BIOS assemblies are added in operation 2.
To manufacture 100 PCBs, 104 BIOS assemblies are required. You can plan 4%
component scrap in the BIOS assembly material master, BOM item, or both. The
component scrap that you enter in the material master applies to all materials
containing the BIOS assemblies as components. The component scrap that you
208
Combined Scrap
enter in the BOM item takes priority over the component scrap that is entered in
the material master.
5.5.2
Component and Operation Scrap
Next we need to establish that an operation scrap of 10% occurs in operation 1, and
20% occurs in operation 2. You plan for operation scrap in the routing operation
details, which reduces the activity quantity corresponding to the yield from the
previous operation. Let’s look at an example as shown in Figure 5.38.
Routing
Plan:
100 PC
100 Operation 1
-10 Install/test
90
-18
BOM
Input
quantity
Blank PCBs
Processor
100 PC
100 PC
(100 h)
BIOS
Operation 2
Install/test
104 PC
Component
scrap 4 %
(90 h)
Finished PCBs
Figure 5.38
72 PC
Operation Scrap Reduces Output Quantity
Output scrap reduces the operation output yield. In this example, the operation
scrap of 10% reduces operation 1 output from 100 PC to 90 PC. The operation
scrap of 20% reduces operation 2 output from 90 PC to 72 PC. You can plan routing
operation scrap in the operation detail screen previously shown in Figure 5.26.
5.5.3
Component, Operation, and Assembly Scrap
Let’s now look at a scenario involving the manufacture of 100 PC inished PCBs
instead of 72 PC. You need to increase the input quantity of components and subassemblies to manufacture 100 inished PCBs. You achieve this by entering 38.89%
assembly scrap in the inished PCB material master MRP 1 view.
Let’s analyze how assembly scrap increases the quantity of inished PCBs in Figure
5.39.
209
5.5
5
Scrap Variance
Routing
Plan:
100 PC
Operation
scrap 10%
139 Operation 1
- 14 Install/test
Operation
scrap 20%
(100 h)
125 Operation 2
-25 Install/test
BOM
Input
quantity
Blank PCBs 139 PC
Processor 139 PC
BIOS
145 PC
Component
scrap 4 %
(90 h)
Assembly
scrap 38.89%
Figure 5.39
Finished PCBs
72 PC
Assembly Scrap Corrects Output Quantity
Plan assembly scrap of 38.89% increases the output quantity of inished PCBs from
72 PC to 100 PC. Assembly scrap also increases the input quantity of components
from 100 PC to 139 PC. Because 4% component scrap is also planned for the BIOS,
the input quantity is increased from 104 PC to 145 PC. The BIOS quantity of 145
PC is calculated as follows:
1. Assembly Scrap
The planned assembly scrap of 38.89% entered in the inished PCB material
master MRP 1 view increases the BIOS quantity from 100 PC to 139 PC.
2. Component Scrap
The planned component scrap of 4% entered in the BIOS material master MRP
4 view, or the BOM item details screen, increases the BIOS quantity from 139
PC to 145 PC.
Note
You can automatically calculate the assembly scrap required to compensate for a reduced
production output due to operation scrap by scheduling the routing and transferring the
assembly scrap into the material master, which we‘ll discuss later in Section 5.5.6.
We‘ve corrected the output quantity of inished PCBs with plan assembly scrap.
However, the input quantity of BIOS is 145 PC, while the required quantity is 125,
which enters operation 2 from operation 1 as shown in Figure 5.39.
210
Combined Scrap
Let’s now explore how to correct the component quantity with BOM item operation scrap.
5.5.4
BOM Item Operation Scrap
Operation scrap entered in the routing reduces the activity quantity, rather than the
component quantity. You also need to enter operation scrap of 20% in the BOM
item in order to ensure that the correct quantity of BIOS assemblies is removed
from inventory. The resulting quantities are shown in Figure 5.40.
Routing
Plan:
100 PC
Operation
scrap 10%
139 Operation 1
- 14 Install/test
Operation
scrap 20%
(139 h)
125 Operation 2
-25 Install/test
BOM
Blank PCBs 139 PC
Processor 139 PC
BIOS
Figure 5.40
Finished PCBs
125 PC
Component
scrap 4%
Operation
scrap 20%
(125 h)
Assembly
scrap 38.89%
Input
quantity
100 PC
Net ID
selected
BOM Item Operation Scrap Corrects Component Quantity
BOM item operation scrap reduces the BIOS input quantity from 145 PC, shown in
Figure 5.39, to 125 PC as shown in Figure 5.40. This number corresponds with the
quantity of 125, which enters operation 2 from operation 1. You plan BOM item
operation scrap as previously shown in Figure 5.27. The BIOS quantity of 125 PC
shown in Figure 5.40 is calculated as follows:
1. Net ID Checkbox
When you plan BOM item operation scrap, you‘re required to select the Net ID
checkbox, which ignores assembly scrap. At this stage, the component quanitity
is 100 PC.
2. Operation Scrap
Plan operation scrap entered in the BOM item increases the component quantity
by 20%. At this stage, the component quantity is 120 PC.
211
5.5
5
Scrap Variance
3. Component Scrap
Plan component scrap entered in the BOM item increases the component quantity
by 4%. At this stage, the component quantity is 125 PC.
By following these steps, we removed the assembly scrap of 38.89% from the BOM
item, replaced it with operation scrap of 20%, and then increased the quantity by
4% component scrap.
5.5.5
Operation and Assembly Scrap
Let’s now analyze our scenario without component scrap to help further illustrate
how plan scrap affects quantities. Component plan scrap has been removed from
the scenario shown in Figure 5.41.
Routing
Plan:
100 PC
Operation
scrap 10%
139 Operation 1
- 14 Install/test
Operation
scrap 20%
(139 h)
125 Operation 2
-25 Install/test
BOM
Blank PCBs 139 PC
Processor 139 PC
BIOS
Figure 5.41
Finished PCBs
120 PC
Component
scrap 0%
Operation
scrap 20%
(125 h)
Assembly
scrap 38.89%
Input
quantity
100 PC
Net ID
selected
Operation and Assembly Scrap without Component Scrap
We have selected the Net ID checkbox, which ensures assembly scrap is ignored
for the BIOS component. Operation scrap of 20% then increases the BIOS quantity
from 100 PC to 120 PC.
Let’s look at how you can automatically calculate the assembly scrap required to
compensate for reduced production output due to operation scrap.
5.5.6
Calculate Assembly Scrap
Plan operation scrap records how many products will be lost or damaged in an
operation. It reduces the output of an operation into subsequent operations. You
212
Combined Scrap
can enter plan assembly scrap in the material master MRP 1 view to achieve the
required production output in combination with plan operation scrap.
If operation scrap occurs in many operations and in many assemblies, it can be
time-consuming to manually calculate the required assembly scrap. You can automatically calculate assembly scrap and have the system populate the corresponding
material master ield.
Assembly Scrap Formula
Let’s follow an example to illustrate how assembly scrap is calculated.
EE
EE
EE
Operation scrap reduces operation output quantity:
EE
Input quantity 1,000 units
EE
Operation 10 contains 20% operation scrap: Output quantity 800 units
EE
Operation 20 contains 20% operation scrap: Output quantity 640 units
Assembly scrap required to produce 1,000 assemblies:
EE
Input quantity 1,562 units achieved with assembly scrap of 56.25%
EE
Operation 10 contains 20% operation scrap: Output quantity 1,250 units
EE
Operation 20 contains 20% operation scrap: Output quantity 1,000 units
The system calculates assembly scrap with the following formula:
Assembly scrap = 1 / (1 – operation scrap) × 1 / (1 – operation scrap) – 1
EE
You calculate assembly scrap in this example with the following values:
Assembly scrap
= 1 / (1 – 0.2) × 1 / (1 – 0.2) – 1
= (1.25 ×1.25) – 1
= 0.5625
= 56.25%
Now that we’ve examined the formula to calculate assembly scrap, let’s see how
you get the system to automatically calculate assembly scrap.
Assembly Scrap Calculation
You calculate assembly scrap automatically with Transaction CA97 or via menu
path Logistics • Production • Master Data • Routings • Extras • Material
213
5.5
5
Scrap Variance
Master • Schedule Material Master. The selection screen shown in Figure 5.42
is displayed.
Figure 5.42
Transfer Scheduling Results to Material Master
This transaction allows you to transfer scheduling results from routings to material
masters. You can transfer setup and teardown time, processing time, inter-operation
time, assembly scrap, and base quantity. The transfer ensures consistency of
scheduling data between routings and material masters, which is mandatory for
requirements and detailed planning.
Select the Update with assembly scrap checkbox to update the Assembly scrap
ield in the material master MRP1 view with the automatically calculated assembly
scrap.
Note
If scheduling does not calculate an assembly scrap value, then the material master
assembly scrap value is overwritten with the value zero.
Type in your entries in the selection screen in Figure 5.42 and press (Enter) to
display the results screen shown in Figure 5.43.
214
Summary
Figure 5.43
Transfer Scheduling Results Output Screen
The results screen lists the material masters that were selected and displays the
success of the update.
Now that we’ve discussed how to automatically calculate assembly scrap, we’ve
reached the end of this chapter on scrap variance. Let’s review what we covered.
5.6
Summary
In this chapter, we discussed scrap basics, including the difference between scrap
and rework, and presented a case scenario involving the interaction between
assembly and component scrap, and the decision of whether to scrap or rework.
We also briely looked at the deinition of the three types of scrap: assembly scrap,
component scrap, and operation scrap.
We then analyzed each of the three types of scrap at a detailed level and looked at
diagrams to help you understand the effect of scrap on quantities and costs. We
also looked at how to plan scrap by making master data entries, and we examined
the priorities if two entries are made.
We analyzed the effect of plan scrap on cost estimates by analyzing cost estimates
before and after the plan scrap entries. We also looked at a shortcut for determining
if assembly and/or operation scrap inluence a cost estimate: clicking on the cost
estimate quantity structure tab.
We explained how actual scrap postings occur, by irst creating a production order
and then carrying out conirmations involving scrap. We then carried out variance
calculation and analyzed the output results screen.
215
5.6
5
Scrap Variance
We then examined three detailed reports for each type of scrap:
EE
First, we analyzed the effect of not planning scrap and then posting actual scrap,
and the resulting unfavorable variance.
EE
Second, we saw the effect of planning for scrap but not actually posting scrap,
and the resulting favorable variance.
EE
Third, we examined the ideal scenario of planning for scrap and then posting
the planned amounts of scrap. One of the main beneits of this scenario is the
reduction in total variance, making it easier to analyze other variance categories,
as described in Chapter 4.
Finally, we followed scenarios combining the three types of scrap, and then examined how to automatically calculate assembly scrap.
In Chapter 6, we’ll walk through the many excellent standard reports available for
CO reporting in general and for variance reporting in particular.
216
Index
A
Activity
Confirmation, 52, 97, 100, 104, 110, 176
Consumption, 154, 157
Price, 36, 42, 66
Quantity, 36, 152, 154, 177, 198
Rate, 41, 51
Rates, 150
Type, 40, 155
Activity-dependent planning, 152, 154
Activity-independent costs, 154, 155
Activity previously conirmed, 107
Activity scheduled quantity, 23
Actual
Cost, 23, 119, 183, 193, 204, 236
Credit, 119
Debit, 151
Scrap, 16, 114, 176
Actual assembly scrap, 181
Actual costing, 172, 253, 259
Actual cost splitting, 155
Actual price calculation, 158, 162
Actual price indicator, 160
Actual procurement lot size, 48
Actual scrap, 16
Allocated actual cost, 156
Alternate summarization hierarchy, 227
Alternative cost estimate, 121
Alternative methods of manufacture, 52
Actual, 181
Analysis, 183
BOM item, 178
Confimation, 181
Cost estimate text, 180
Definition, 177
Example, 177
Master data, 178
Material master, 178
Output scrap, 177
Plan, 179
Quantity, 177
Without planning, 184
With planning, 184
Assessment, 150
Auto goods receipt, 181
Automatic goods receipt, 105
B
Backlushing, 105, 181
Balance sheet account, 131, 271
Base, 55
Bill of material (BOM), 26, 45, 50, 50, 87
Alternative, 137
Lowest-level, 51
BOM item, 51, 178, 188, 200
Bulk material, 51
Quantity field, 51
Relevancy to costing indicator, 51
Bottom line, 102
Building lease, 54
Bulk material, 51
C
Calculation base
Cost element, 55
Cost element group, 56
Overhead, 55
Rows, 55
Change in WIP, 133
Collective processing time, 139
Company assets, 131
Component, 25, 98
Lower-level, 35
Purchasing requirements, 38
Component scrap, 176, 187
Actual, 190
Analysis, 193
281
Index
BOM item, 188
Case scenario, 189
Definition, 187
Field, 179
Input quantity variance, 190
Master data, 188
Material master, 188
Plan, 189
Priority, 189
Quantity, 187
Without planning, 190
With planning, 190
Component standard price, 98
Condition technique, 221
Conirmation, 181, 190
Activity, 143
Default yield, 106
Expected quantity, 106
Labor, 143
Per operation, 108
Production order, 104, 108
Quantities, 106
Screen, 143
Time event, 105
Time ticket, 105
Conirmed scrap, 182, 203
Conirmed yield, 134
Consumption account, 97
Control costs, 119, 137, 143
Controlling, 97
Area, 219
Level, 87
CO-PA, 111, 144, 150
CO product group, 222
Assign materials, 223
Create, 222
Hierarchy, 223
Corrective action, 122
Cost
Activity, 38
Activity-independent, 40
Actual, 119
Labor, 26, 38, 52
Material, 51
Overhead, 52, 54
282
Primary, 38
Target, 131
Unit, 127
Variable, 38, 40
Cost center, 51, 100
Activity quantity, 44
Actual costs, 155
Actual/plan reports, 147
Analyze balance, 147
Assessment, 101
Assignment, 166
Balance, 147, 149, 154, 155
Credit, 55
Credits, 149, 157
Debits, 149, 158
Fixed cost variance, 158
Functional area, 258
Input price variance, 156
Input quantity variance, 156
Input variance, 156
Line items, 150
Manager, 38
Output variance, 157
Overhead, 99
Plan credits, 150
Plan debits, 149
Planned costs, 26
Planning, 38
Primary planning, 38
Production, 150, 154
Profit center, 264
Purchasing, 165
Remaining input variance, 157
Report, 42, 149
Resource-usage variance, 157
Target cost analysis, 147, 154
Target costs, 151
Under/over absorption, 102, 107
Under/overabsorption, 147
Variance, 42, 154, 173
Variance analysis, 147, 154
Variance calculation, 155
Cost center accounting, 23, 35, 37
Cost component, 58
Available, 60
Index
Component material cost, 59
Configuration, 59
Labor, 58, 60
Material, 58
Overhead, 58
Roll up costs, 59
Split, 58
Structure, 59
Cost component structure, 60
Costed multilevel BOM, 66
Cost element, 38, 55, 155
Button, 141
Category, 97
Change, 164
Default account assignment, 164
Group, 155
PPV, 166
Primary, 97
Secondary, 99
Cost estimate, 141
Alternative material, 121
Finish date, 66
Itemization, 138
Mixed, 125
Modified standard, 122
Preliminary, 16, 44, 112, 117, 131, 137
Release, 138
Released, 176
Standard, 16, 112, 117, 137, 138
Start date, 66
Costing lot size, 48, 65, 127, 168, 170
Costing run, 16, 72, 117, 163, 171
Analysis, 79
Background processing, 77
Company code, 81
Costing, 78
Costing level, 78
Costing variant, 81
Costing version, 81
Create, 72
Dates tab, 74
Edit, 74
Execute column, 75
Flow step column, 74
Log, 77
Log by costing levels, 78
Marking, 81
Master data errors, 72
Material overview, 76
Other prices, 83
Parameter, 74
Print log, 77
Release, 83
Release date, 72
Rerun, 81
Selection, 75
Selection screen, 73
Structural explosion, 76
Costing sheet, 52, 54, 128
Available, 54
Base, 55
Calculation rate, 56
Components, 54
Configuration, 54
Cost element, 55
Credit key, 57
Dependency, 56
Example, 54
Fixed cost, 56
Maintenance, 58
Origin group, 56
Overhead rate, 56
Percentage rate, 56
Variable cost, 56
Costing status, 71
Costing step, 78
Costing type, 62
Costing variant, 15, 53, 61
Components, 62
Configuration, 44, 61
Costing type, 62
Date control, 66
Permitted, 69
PPC2, 121
Transfer control, 65
Costing version, 65, 94
Costing view, 47
Cost object, 97
Cost object hierarchy, 122
Actual costs, 122
283
Index
Equivalences, 122
Target cost version 3, 122
Cost of sales, 154, 176, 187
Costs
Actual, 97, 253
Cost center, 107
Primary, 97
Production order, 98
Report actual, 109
Secondary, 97
Costs based on ield, 67
Create production order, 103
Credit, 55
Credit key, 57
Actual overhead debit, 58
Cost center, 57
Fixed costs, 58
Plan overhead cost, 58
Secondary cost element, 58
Variable costs, 58
Current planned price, 49
Customer, 219
D
Data collection, 219, 224, 231
Hierarchy node, 232
Objects, 233
Product drilldown, 225
Results screen, 225, 233
Summarization time frame, 232
Date control, 66
Dates tab, 65
Debit, 98
Default
Account assignment, 164, 165
Activities, 107
Activity quantity, 106
Assembly scrap, 182
Quantities, 106
Yield, 106
Variance key, 115
Deletion lag
Activate, 135
284
Revoke, 135
Dependency ield, 56
Dependent requirements, 26, 28
Detailed analysis, 109
Detailed report, 16, 217, 235
Cost element details, 235
Drilldown, 235
Source document, 236
Detail list checkbox, 139, 145
Drill down, 110
Drilldown functionality, 217
Drilling down, 143, 172
E
Edit costing run, 72
Electricity, 128
Equivalence numbers, 155
Error messages, 45
Estimated purchase price, 49
Exception message, 30
Exception rules, 140, 217, 235
Expected cost, 111
Expense account, 98
External activity, 149
External business transactions, 97
External procurement, 26, 32, 47
External vendor, 98
F
Final conirmation, 105
Final operation, 106
Financial accounting, 98, 110
Finished good, 51
Finished product, 172
Fiscal period, 128
Fiscal year, 38
Fixed component, 154
Fixed cost variance, 158
Flow step column, 74
Future planned price, 49
Future purchasing requirements, 34
Index
G
General ledger account, 110
Goods issue, 123
Goods movement, 106, 110, 192
Goods receipt, 52, 123, 138, 163, 265
Quantity, 134
Valuated, 143
GR/IR, 98
Account, 163
Gross proit, 102, 177, 187
H
Highest-level report, 217
History tab, 89
I
Incremental debit, 159
Information system, 155
In-house production, 26
Initial planning, 38, 110
Input price variance, 156
Input quantity variance, 107, 143
Input variance, 156
Insurance, 54
Internal order, 97
Inventory, 97, 101, 111, 138
Valuation, 45, 98, 117
Revaluation, 71, 81
L
Labor allocation, 100
Legacy system, 41
Line item details, 110, 142, 237
Line item postings, 166
Line item report, 16, 145, 146, 217, 237
Activity confirmations, 239
Goods receipt, 239
Material documents, 239
Posting date, 238
Quantity, 239
Source documents, 239
Logistics master data, 44
Long-term MRP, 32, 35
Long-term planning, 23, 25, 36, 43, 44
BOM, 29
Collective run, 29
MRP list, 30
Planning horizon, 29
Planning scenario, 26
Processing key, 29
Run, 28
Simulative dependent requirements, 29
Simulative planned orders, 29
Version active indicator, 26
Lot size, 127
Lower-level cost estimate, 89
M
Maintain Version Coniguration, 159
Manually insert operation, 108
Manufacturing company, 59
Manufacturing order, 143
Efficiency, 52
Margin analysis, 102, 154, 176
Gross profit, 102
Net profit, 102
Operating expenses, 102
Operating profit, 102
Pretax profit, 102
Profit margin, 102
SG & A, 102
Mark cost estimate, 70
Marking allowance, 68
Master data, 15, 46, 123, 178, 188
BOM, 45
Fields, 46
Logistics, 46
Material master, 50
Routing, 45
Stable, 46
Statistical key figure, 268
285
Index
Material consumption, 172
Material document, 110, 168
Material group, 217, 222
Material ledger, 16, 172
Material master, 46, 50, 61, 70, 115
Material movement, 97
Material origin, 217
Material origin checkbox, 138
Material overhead, 55
Material overview, 76
Material Requirements Planning (MRP), 26,
175
Message analysis, 145
Metal plate, 175
Mixed
Cost estimate, 90, 91, 94, 125
Costing, 90, 91
Costing checkbox, 95
Price, 90, 125
Price variance, 91, 125
Procurement costs, 90
Mixing ratio, 90, 93
Modiied cost estimate, 122
Modiied product, 49
Mounting holes, 175
MRP, 26, 178, 187, 188, 202, 218
Exception message, 30
Long-term, 32
Operative, 26
N
Net ID checkbox, 179, 200
Net proit, 102
Nonrecurring expense, 150
O
Operating proit, 102
Operating rate, 152
Operation, 52, 105, 131
Operation details, 199
Operation scrap, 176, 197, 261
Actual, 202
286
Analysis, 204
Assembly scrap, 198
BOM item, 198
Confirmation, 203
Cost estimate text, 202
Definition, 197
Field, 179
Master data, 199
Operation details, 199
Operations overview, 202
Output scrap, 197
Plan, 197, 200
Quantity, 198
Routing, 198
Subsequent operations, 176
Valuable components, 176
Without planning, 201
With planning, 201
Operation sequence, 108
Operative MRP, 26, 35
Order
Category, 242
Fully delivered, 143
Manufacturing, 143
Quantity, 106
Status, 137, 143
Order information system, 106, 218, 239
Layout, 240
MRP controller, 239
Operation, 239
Order header, 240
Production supervisor, 239
Order-related manufacturing, 52
Order selection, 242
Order category, 242
Order type, 243
Original transaction, 110, 143
Origin group, 56
Other prices, 83
Output price variance, 157, 158
Output quantity, 127
Overhead, 45, 127
Calculation, 100, 128
Cost, 54
Cost center, 99
Key, 56
Index
Overhead rate, 55, 57
Calculation base, 56
Date-dependent, 57
Dependency, 56
Percentage, 57
Percentage factor, 56
Overhead rates, 23
P
Partial assembly, 134
Payroll, 128
Period, 43
Period-end closing, 52
Period-end process, 128
Plan
Activity, 43
Activity quantity, 42, 150
Capacity quantity, 42
Component scrap, 188
Cost, 23, 97
Cost center, 23, 36
Debit, 154
Depreciation, 38
Fixed costs, 40
Payroll, 38
Primary cost, 38
Production, 23, 38
Reconciliation, 38, 44
Sales, 23, 38
Scrap, 16
Version, 32
Planned assembly scrap, 181, 191
Planned independent requirements, 25
Consume, 28
Sales order, 28
Version, 29
Planned price 1, 49, 64
Planning horizon, 29
Planning layout, 39
Planning performance, 121
Planning scenario, 26
Planning variance, 112, 121, 262
Plan operating rate, 158
Plant manager, 217
Possible entries
Operation sequence, 108
Order category, 242
Order type, 243
Process category, 92
Procurement type, 46
Summarization characteristics, 230
Posting origin, 97
Posting Period, 145
PPV, 163
Preliminary cost estimate, 85, 112
Controlling level, 87
Costing Data tab, 87
Mass processing, 90
Production version, 87
Transfer control, 87
Pretax proit, 102
Previous planned price, 49
Price
Accuracy, 254, 263
Break, 171
Revaluation, 154
Unit, 68, 263
Price control, 50
Moving average, 123
Standard, 123
Primary cost, 41
Element, 38, 59, 97, 98, 101
Planning, 44, 150
Printed circuit boards, 177
Process category, 92
Processor, 188
Process order, 106, 109
Procure components, 45
Procurement alternative, 90, 92, 94, 125
Procurement type, 46
Product Cost by Order, 52, 113, 136
Product Cost by Period, 52, 90, 113
Product cost collector, 47, 52, 84, 112, 226
Analysis report, 142
Analyze, 109, 141
Create, 138
Deletion flag, 138
Settlement, 144
Variance key, 138
Product development, 72
287
Index
Product drilldown
Configuration, 220
Control parameters, 220
Cumulative, 226
Data collection, 224
Improve performance, 226
Periodic, 226
Period range, 226
Reports, 220
Run report, 225
Product group, 24, 221
Product hierarchy, 220, 221
Production
Control, 52, 118
Cost center, 38, 100, 150
Costs, 130
Efficiency, 120
Line, 118
Order, 47, 101
Output, 151
Output account, 101
Performance, 120
Plan, 24, 38, 44
Process, 54, 87, 137
Quantity, 25
Run, 118
Variance, 112, 120, 122, 173
Version, 53, 87, 90
Production order
Activity confirmation, 104, 110
Automatic goods receipt, 105
Backflush, 105
BOM, 103
Confirmation, 105, 106
Costs, 98
Create, 103
Credit, 101
Details, 106
Information system, 106
List, 106
Material, 103
Operation sequence, 108
Personnel, 217
Primary credit, 101
Release, 104
Resource, 176
Routing, 103
288
Secondary credit, 102
Statistic, 188
Status, 118
Type, 107
Variances, 102
Proitability analysis, 102, 267
Proitability reporting, 177
Proit and loss account, 131, 271
Proit margin, 102
Propose activities, 107
Purchased items, 25
Purchase order, 169
Price, 35, 163
Quantity, 35
Value, 34, 35
Purchase price, 23, 163
Variance, 163
Purchase requisition, 32
Purchasing department, 35
Performance, 163
Purchasing info record, 25, 32, 44, 45, 163,
169
Conditions, 169
Price, 61
Scale, 170
Validity periods, 170
Purchasing information system, 23, 32, 38
Purchasing requirements, 34, 44
Q
Quality inspection operation, 108
Quality standards, 177
Quantity structure, 87, 120, 201
Date, 66
Tab, 180
Type, 91
R
Raw material, 51, 163
Inventory, 98
Reconciliation, 131
Redundant messages, 145
Reference quantity, 134
Index
Release, 84
Cost estimate, 71
Production order, 103
Step, 84
Relevancy to costing indicator, 52
Remaining input variance, 157
Remaining variance, 115, 127, 158
Repetitive manufacturing, 52, 118
Replacement parts, 157
Reports
Cost center, 244
Line item, 217, 237
Product drilldown, 220, 264
Production order, 239
Source documents, 244
Standard, 217
Summarization hierarchies, 227
Summarized, 220
Request for quotation (RFQ), 32
Revaluation, 162
Rework, 175
ROH, 51
Roll up, 51
Rounding differences, 127
Routing, 45, 51, 87, 108, 117, 137, 197
Structure, 117
S
Sales and operations planning (SOP), 23, 44
Sales order, 28, 219
Sales plan, 24, 44
Sales scenario, 23
Scenario analysis, 65
Scenario testing, 36
Scheduled activity quantity, 42
Scheduled activity requirements, 26
Scrap, 137, 175, 176
Actual, 16, 114, 176
Amounts, 176
Assembly, 176, 177, 183
Calculation, 176
Checkbox, 114, 116
Component, 187, 189
Confirmed, 192
Costs, 176
Input, 187, 255
Operation, 192, 197
Output, 177, 192, 197, 253, 261
Percentage, 176, 179
Plan, 16
Planned, 114, 176
Target, 176
Valuate, 120
Value, 114, 177, 187
Variance, 114, 115, 116, 176, 186
Variance checkbox, 127
Secondary cost element, 59
Type 41, 42, 43, 99, 100
Select Layout Icon, 141
Settlement, 102, 111, 112, 144, 267
Basic list, 145
Current period, 143, 145
Error messages, 145
Line item report, 145
List of values, 146
Period-end, 144
Prior periods, 145
Processing time, 145
Reversal, 145
Rule, 138
Selection parameters, 146
Selection screen, 146
Sequential, 138
Type, 138
Settlement type
FUL, 143
Full, 143
PER, 138
Periodic, 138
Setup time, 48, 127
Shop loor control, 239
Simulative planned order, 32
SOP, 24
Sort line items, 143
Source document, 110, 168, 217, 228
Specialized activities, 98
Special procurement type, 47
Splitting rules, 155
Standard activity time, 51
Standard cost estimate, 45, 64, 68, 117, 179,
189, 200
Costing run, 72
289
Index
Costing status VO, 70
Costing variant PPC1, 64
Costing version, 69
Current, 89
Future, 89
History tab, 89
Mark, 49, 68
Marking allowance, 68
One per material, 87
Previous, 89
Previously released, 49
Release, 45, 49, 71
Status FR, 84
Status VO, 83
Valuation variant, 68
Standard hierarchy, 245
Standard price, 163, 176, 180
Finished goods, 101
Standard report, 16, 217
Standard value ield, 52
Status
Deletion flag, 135
Determine automatically, 143
Determine manually, 143
Fully delivered, 136
Released, 136
Technically complete, 135, 136
Selection profile, 229, 231
Stock/requirements list, 31
Stock valuation, 64
Strategy sequence, 64
Structural explosion step, 76
Subcontracting, 64
Substitute components, 124
Summarization
Analysis, 218
Level, 227
Report, 217, 230
Time frame, 225
Summarization hierarchy
ALV format, 230
Data collection, 231
Exception rules, 235
Hierarchy levels, 229
Material, 230
290
Order number, 230
Plant, 230
Profit center, 230
Selection profile, 231
Single objects, 235
Status selection profile, 229
Summarized analysis, 16
Summarized reporting, 139
System messages, 45
T
Target cost, 97, 111, 114, 118, 119, 131, 137,
138, 152
Button, 141
Configuration, 143
Version, 139, 159
Version 0, 111, 119, 268
Version 1, 112, 120
Version 2, 113, 121
Version 3, 116, 121
Target debit, 154
Target quantity, 157
Task list, 51
Tax, 102
Tear-down time, 127
Test run checkbox, 155
Total variance, 64, 111, 269
Total WIP, 133
Trafic light symbols, 235
Transactional data, 46
Transfer control, 36, 65, 87
U
Under/overabsorption, 147, 269
Unfavorable variance, 48
Unit cost, 48, 127
Unplanned consumption, 157
User entry, 68
Index
V
Valuable components, 197
Valuation, 23
Class, 50
Date, 66
Valuation variant, 63, 117, 120, 270
Activity types/processes, 64
External processing, 64
Scrap and WIP, 118, 131
Subcontracting, 63
Value ield, 112
Variable component, 154
Variable quantity, 157
Variance
Analysis, 45, 47, 63, 102, 111, 123, 217
Button, 141
Calculate, 114
Calculation, 16, 101, 111, 114, 122, 126,
136, 138, 154, 155, 182, 192
Categories, 271
Categories, 101, 115, 122, 136, 155
Collective, 139
Column, 140
Component, 138
Configuration, 113
Cost center, 147
Cumulative, 143
Debit, 149
Favorable, 149
High, 140
Individual materials, 140
Input, 123
Input price, 112, 123
Input quantity, 107, 124, 141, 143, 193
Key, 47, 53, 113, 116, 138, 176
Keys default, 115
Largest, 140
Lot size, 112, 127
Manufacturing, 102
Mixed-price, 125
Original cause, 143
Output price, 126
Planning, 112, 121, 137, 262
Plant manufacturing, 217
Price, 71
Process order, 109
Product cost collector, 102
Production, 71, 112, 120, 137, 264, 269
Production order, 109
Recalculate, 140
Reconcile, 146
Reconciliation, 131
Reduce, 71
Remaining, 115, 127
Remaining input, 125
Reporting, 16
Requirements, 143
Resource-usage, 124
Scrap, 137, 193
Sequence, 144
Sort, 140
Source, 102
Total, 101, 111, 136, 139
Unfavorable, 48, 140, 234
Variant, 115, 116
Write line items, 114
Variance analysis, 39
Variance Category Columns, 141
Variance Key, 47, 53
Vendor information, 46
Vendor quotation, 25, 35, 45, 163, 170
Version, 36
Version 0, 36
Version coniguration, 159
W
Work center, 35, 87, 100, 137
Load, 44
Work in Process (WIP), 131
At target, 131
Calculate, 118, 136
Cancel, 135, 136, 144
Explanation, 133
Target, 118
Unsettled, 143
Workload, 98
291
Index
Y
Z
Yield, 105, 134
Default, 106
Previously confirmed, 106
Propose, 106
To be confirmed, 106, 107
Total, 107
Zero balance, 102
292